Skip to main content

La Logique et la Bible

       J'ai écrit un courte réflexion en Fevrier de cette année sur la relation entre Dieu et la logique. Voilà quelques réflexions sur la relation entre la logique et la Bible.

       Évidemment, je présuppose, pour ces réflexions, que Dieu existe, et que tu as lu est accepte les arguments de ma publication sur Dieu et la logique.

       Voilà le première argument:

       (1) Si les lois de l’être, et par conséquence, les lois de la logique, trouvent leur fondation ultime dans la nature de Dieu; 
       (2) Et, si un être communique selon sa nature,
       (3) Alors, Dieu, dans ses communications ne peut pas se contredire.

       Voilà le deuxième argument:

       (1) Si Dieu, dans ses communications, ne peut pas se contredire.
       (2) Et, si la Bible est la Parole (communication) de Dieu; 
       (3) Alors, il ne peut pas y avoir aucun contradiction dans ce que la Bible affirme, quand c’est proprement compris. 

       Voilà le troisième argument:

       (1) De plus, Si Dieu est la créateur de tout être contingent (pour la brévité on va utiliser le terme univers pour parle de l’ensemble des êtres crées); 
       (2) Et, si la Bible est la Parole de Dieu, 
       (3) Alors il ne peut y avoir aucun contradiction entre ce qui est (ou ce qui était), et ce que la Bible dit être (ou avoir était). 

       Voilà le quatrième argument:

       (1) Si la Bible est la communication de Dieu, transmis par des hommes inspirés de l’esprit Saint; 
       (2) Et, si la logique est la science de la pensée, 
       (3) Alors la logique peut, et devrait, être utilisé pour analyser et comprendre la Bible.

       Voilà un dernière argument:
      (1) Si ces arguments sont valide et les prémisses vrai, 
      (2) Et, si chaque humaine est capable de comprendre et utilisé la logique,
      (3) Alors n'importe quel personne, Athée ou Chrétien, Musulman ou Boudhiste, peut utilisé la logique pour analyser et comprendre la Bible.

Just saying!

Popular posts from this blog

How Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism resulted in Agnosticism

Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to take a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions. I would submit that Kant’s synthesis of these two views leads to an agnosticism about what Kant called “the thing-in-itself”, and ultimately to the philosophical positions known as Atheism, determinism, and nihilism.

Kant’s Sources
First of all, Kant was influenced by Hume’s empiricism and Newton’s physics. He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and only led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon…


Leisure: The Basis of Culture & the Philosophical Act. Josef Pieper. Translated by Alexander Dru. 1963. Reprint, Ignatius Press, 2009. 143 pp. $12.99. ISBN 978-1-58617-256-5.
            This book is composed of two articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of each of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this book, Leisure: the Basis of Culture and The Philosophical Act, were both published in 1947, and, as such, were written during the cultural crisis in Germany that followed the Second World War. Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time – Martin Heidegger. As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg…

A Short outline of Charles Taylor's: The Malaise of Modernity

            This is simply an outline of Taylor’s basic argument in this short work written by Charles Taylor. The idea of this outline is to help the reader understand the book by providing a simple outline of the basic argument that Taylor is presenting here. The book, which is essentially the manuscript is the fruit of a series of presentations that Taylor made at the Massey Conferences which are hosted by Massey College and Radio-Canada, is divided into 10 chapters. In the first chapter Taylor essentially proposes three causes (recognizing that there may be more) of the Malaise of Modernity: (1) Individualism or the Loss of Sense, (2) The Primacy of Instrumental Reason or the Loss of Ends, and (3) The effect on society and politics in general of the loss of sense to an inauthentic individualism and the domination of instrumental reason, or, the loss of true freedom. Taylor considers the first Malaise in chapters 2 to 8, the second in c…