Skip to main content


Rediscovering Paul: An Introduction to His World, Letters and Theology. David B. Capes, Rodney Reeves and E. Randolph Richards. InterVarsity Press, 2007. 350 pp. $25.00. ISBN 978-0-8303-3941-4.

            The history of Pauline studies could be described as a tempestuous ocean of ideas and theories. Just as there was a search for the “real or historical Jesus” there has been a search for the “real or historical Paul”. For a layman who has no formal training in Pauline studies, as well as for the beginning student, or, for that matter, anybody who is not familiar with the wealth of material that has been written in Pauline studies in the last 2000 years, it is difficult to find an introductory level book that not only provides the necessary historical and cultural background for one to begin studying Paul, but also introduces the various views in the numerous debates. As such, the book by Capes, Reeves and Richards is like a lighthouse lighting up the treacherous waters so that boats can navigate safely, through the rocks, to the harbour. In order to get an idea as to why this book is such an important introduction to Paul we will explain, first of all, the proposed purpose for the book, give an outline of the content that is covered by the authors, and then give our conclusions as to the worth of the book.

            The authors explain, in the introduction to their book, that the purpose of their book is to “present an overview of Paul that gathers together context, content and theology with the goal of answering that perennial question of students: ‘So what?’”[1] They conclude by reminding us that their goal “has been to help serious readers of the New Testament rediscover Paul within his or her world and consider what the apostle to the Gentiles can say to our world.”[2] So much has been written about Paul, and the Pauline Epistles, suggesting different ways of understanding Paul that attempting to work one’s way through the waste to find a helpful understanding of the great apostle can seem like a daunting task. Due to all that has been said about Paul the notion of “rediscovering” the real or historical Paul is an accurate description of both what is needed, and what this book has done. The authors take us on an adventure through time to walk in the world of the apostle Paul. In 350 pages they do what many scolars have only dreamed of doing. The purpose of this book is to give the beginner, who is serious about wanting to understand the writings of the apostle Paul, the historical, geographical and cultural baggage that is necessary for a proper understanding of the Pauline Epistles.

            In order to accomplish their goal they begin by setting the stage. The first three chapters deal with the historical background that we need to understand before we even begin to explore Paul’s letters. The first chapter deals with life in Paul’s world. The authors explore social standards, the importance of honor and rituals, as well as the effect on Paul and the people that he interacted with of the interaction between the Greek, Roman and Jewish cultures. The second chapter deals with customs related to letter-writing in the first century. This chapter is fundamental for the rest of the book as they will hinge many of their arguments concerning the redaction of the Pauline epistles and the variation in style upon the points that are brought up in this chapter. They argue that due to the fact that secretaries were commonly hired in order to write letters, even for short personal letters, explains why some of Paul’s letters vary in style and language. If Paul used different secretaries when in different cities, this would account for the difference in style.[3] In chapter three the authors consider Paul’s conversion experience and attempt to set up a working timeline of Paul’s ministry.

            Chapters 4 – 9 deal with the Pauline corpus. In each chapter the authors outline the historical and cultural background that motivated the writing of the letters, and influenced what Paul said to each of the churches. They then give a brief summary of the letter (s) discussed and note some of the primary interpretational debates surrounding each letter. The authors attempt to push the reader to further explore the Pauline books, and to decide for themselves how to answer the questions that are raised. For the reader who wishes to push further there are a wealth of footnotes that provide references, as well a list of suggested books at the end of each chapter. As such the book provides for an intellectually stimulating read. The books that they cover are treated in the following order: Galatians in chapter 4, Both Thessalonians letters in chapter 5, the Corinthian letters in chapter 6, Romans in chapter 7, the letters to the other churches in chapter 8 (Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians), and the letters to individuals in chapter 9 (Philemon, 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus). Hebrews is not treated as they do not consider it to be of Pauline origin.[4]

            The last three chapters provide interesting comments on Paul’s theology, his legacy in the first and second century, and how to approach Paul’s letters in our contemporary world. The chapter on Paul’s Theology (chapter 10) is not an indepth or extensive study of Paul’s theology. The authors note the religious and cultural aspects that would have influenced Paul’s theology, and provide a short survey of some of the more stimulating aspects of Paul’s thought, noting the debates that continue to proliferate from Paul’s thoughts. The chapter on Paul’s Legacy (chapter 11) notes the immediate influence that Paul’s writings had, and asks the question of how the Pauline corpus was collected and established as canonical. Chapter 12 concludes with suggestions as to how to read Paul today, and how Paul’s thoughts can still be applied to today’s problems, both within the church and without.

            All in all this book is stimulating read. One needs not, and in light of the purpose of this book, should not, agree with everything the authors say. The authors not only accomplish their goal of introducing the reader to Paul, his world and his theology, but they do so in such a way that the reader is stimulated to keep looking. One of the greatest merits of this book is the way that they leave some of their questions unanswered, such that they both, demonstrate that many of our questions are very difficult to answer, and give the reader the desire to learn more. This book is bestowed with a good-sized Glossary which will be most helpful for lay-men and beginning students, maps of the Mediterranean world, a large Bibliography that provides plenty of reading for further research, an index of authors, a subject index, and a scripture quotation index. As such this book is a great place for beginning one’s research on just about any subject that is related to Pauline studies. Furthermore the authors provide lists of suggested reading at the end of each chapter, a wealth of references, and interesting text boxes that provide a deeper look into controversial subjects or ask about the importance of the subject that was just covered.

            I would highly recommend this book to anybody who wishes to read the Pauline epistles and truly understand what they are reading. Not only that, but this book would be a great textbook for an introductory course in Pauline studies or for a New Testament survey course that concentrates on the Pauline Epistles. Every pastor should have a copy of this book in their library, and every student that is studying the New Testament needs this book. This is a great book for anybody that is interested in reading and understanding the Bible.

[1]David B. Capes, Rodney Reeves and E. Randolph Richards, Rediscovering Paul: An Introduction to His World, Letters and Theology (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2007), 16.

[2]Ibid., 308.

[3]This, and related historical facts, are used to show that there is no reason to reject Pauline authorship of any of the 13 Pauline epistles. The only place where the authors seem to stray from this argument, and accept the notion that a difference of style demonstrates conclusively a different author, is concerning the author of the book of Hebrews. They allow that the book of Hebrews is not Pauline as it is anonymous, and “the letter was so clearly non-Pauline in style. (Ibid., 290.)” This one slip could be excused as being the result of peer-pressure, “No modern scholar accepts it as Pauline. (Ibid.)” Of course so broad a statement is just begging to be refuted. Cf. David Alan Black, (“Who Wrote Hebrews? The Internal and External Evidence Reexamined”, in Faith & Mission, 18/2 (spring 2001), 3-26.) who claims that the evidence actually demonstrates that there is a great amount of similarity in style and diction between the other Pauline epistles and Hebrews (p. 16), and the differences are probably due to Paul’s secretary (notice the coherent application of Capes, Reeves and Richards argument for the authenticity of Paul’s other epistles). Black also notes that there is a great amount of similarity between the theological content of the Paul’s other letters and Hebrews (p. 21). Black concludes that due to the internal and external evidence “the best course of action in our view is to accept that Hebrews was authored by Paul the apostle, possibly with the assistance of an amanuensis such as Luke (p. 22). There is, therefore, at least one modern scholar that accepts Hebrews as a Pauline letter. Furthermore, Black consistently uses the argument used in support of the Pauline authorship of the other letters, by Capes, Reeves and Richards, to support his argument for the Pauline authorship of Hebrews. Personally, I tend to agree with Black’s argument.

[4]Capes, Reeves and Richards, 290.

Popular posts from this blog

How Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism resulted in Agnosticism

Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to take a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions. I would submit that Kant’s synthesis of these two views leads to an agnosticism about what Kant called “the thing-in-itself”, and ultimately to the philosophical positions known as Atheism, determinism, and nihilism.

Kant’s Sources
First of all, Kant was influenced by Hume’s empiricism and Newton’s physics. He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and only led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon…

A Short outline of Charles Taylor's: The Malaise of Modernity

            This is simply an outline of Taylor’s basic argument in this short work written by Charles Taylor. The idea of this outline is to help the reader understand the book by providing a simple outline of the basic argument that Taylor is presenting here. The book, which is essentially the manuscript is the fruit of a series of presentations that Taylor made at the Massey Conferences which are hosted by Massey College and Radio-Canada, is divided into 10 chapters. In the first chapter Taylor essentially proposes three causes (recognizing that there may be more) of the Malaise of Modernity: (1) Individualism or the Loss of Sense, (2) The Primacy of Instrumental Reason or the Loss of Ends, and (3) The effect on society and politics in general of the loss of sense to an inauthentic individualism and the domination of instrumental reason, or, the loss of true freedom. Taylor considers the first Malaise in chapters 2 to 8, the second in c…


Leisure: The Basis of Culture & the Philosophical Act. Josef Pieper. Translated by Alexander Dru. 1963. Reprint, Ignatius Press, 2009. 143 pp. $12.99. ISBN 978-1-58617-256-5.
            This book is composed of two articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of each of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this book, Leisure: the Basis of Culture and The Philosophical Act, were both published in 1947, and, as such, were written during the cultural crisis in Germany that followed the Second World War. Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time – Martin Heidegger. As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg…