Skip to main content

Canadian Apologetics Coalition: Contending for Life and Sexuality


     The Canadian Apologetics Coalition is doing a blog series on Abortion and Human Sexuality. Here is the first blog in the series, Omnibus Bill C-150: True Progress?, published by Jojo Ruba and Justin Wishart on the Faith Beyond Belief Blog. Faith Beyond Belief is an apologetics ministry based in Calgary, Alberta. This blog looks at the Omnibus C-150 Bill which "legalized birth control, divorce, homosexuality and abortion among others." 

      There will be 8 more blog posts in this series by bloggers across Canada touching on subjects such as: 

May 16 - Is Abortion Morally Right or Wrong (A Philosophical Perspective) by David Haines

May 18 - Making a Clear and Concise Case for Life by Tim Barnett

May 20 - Abortion and the Bible: Why Pro-life by Jonathon Van Maren

May 22 - A Personal Story of Adoption by Stephen J. Bedard

May 24 - Living in Colour: Recovering after Abortion by Mckenzie Hahn

May 26 - Homosexuality: Beyond Society and Into Theology by Steven Richard Martins

May 28 - Birth Control by Maaike Rosendal

May 30 - Defending the Inherent Value of Life by Jojo Ruba

Plus, one extra post - The Orwellian World of the Secular Left by Luis Dizon


Keep your eyes open as I will be sharing these various posts as they come out. 

Popular posts from this blog

How Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism resulted in Agnosticism

Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to take a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions. I would submit that Kant’s synthesis of these two views leads to an agnosticism about what Kant called “the thing-in-itself”, and ultimately to the philosophical positions known as Atheism, determinism, and nihilism.


Kant’s Sources
First of all, Kant was influenced by Hume’s empiricism and Newton’s physics. He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and only led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon…

LEISURE: THE BASIS OF CULTURE – A BOOK REVIEW

Leisure: The Basis of Culture & the Philosophical Act. Josef Pieper. Translated by Alexander Dru. 1963. Reprint, Ignatius Press, 2009. 143 pp. $12.99. ISBN 978-1-58617-256-5.
            This book is composed of two articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of each of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this book, Leisure: the Basis of Culture and The Philosophical Act, were both published in 1947, and, as such, were written during the cultural crisis in Germany that followed the Second World War. Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time – Martin Heidegger. As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg…

A Short outline of Charles Taylor's: The Malaise of Modernity

CHARLES TAYLOR’S THE MALAISE OF MODERNITY[1]
            This is simply an outline of Taylor’s basic argument in this short work written by Charles Taylor. The idea of this outline is to help the reader understand the book by providing a simple outline of the basic argument that Taylor is presenting here. The book, which is essentially the manuscript is the fruit of a series of presentations that Taylor made at the Massey Conferences which are hosted by Massey College and Radio-Canada, is divided into 10 chapters. In the first chapter Taylor essentially proposes three causes (recognizing that there may be more) of the Malaise of Modernity: (1) Individualism or the Loss of Sense, (2) The Primacy of Instrumental Reason or the Loss of Ends, and (3) The effect on society and politics in general of the loss of sense to an inauthentic individualism and the domination of instrumental reason, or, the loss of true freedom. Taylor considers the first Malaise in chapters 2 to 8, the second in c…