Skip to main content

What is Justification?

Question:
What's the easiest way to explain justification in your opinion?

Answer :
First of all, we explain justification n terms of a court case. Justification is a legal term. It is what happens when a judge declares that the person on trial is innocent of any crimes that he has been accused of.

There are other meanings for the word justification. It might be helpful to explain them. Justification, secondly, is also what happens when we make a claim, and attempt to back it up with proof. For example: I could say that the best poutine in Quebec is found at the "roulotte de patate" in Gentilly. What would it take for my claim to be "justified"? Proof! So, justification is also what happens when we prove the truth of a statement.

Justification, in a third sense, can also mean the process of making a person become just. In contemporary protestant terminology we use a different word for this process, "sanctification", the process of being made saint or holy (In French the word saint is translated, in English, by the word holy.). (Small rabbit trail here - This third sense is part of the confusion between Catholic theologians of the Middle Ages and contemporary Christians. Quite frequently Catholic theologians in the Middle Ages used the word Justification in this third sense. However, most contemporary Protestants understand the word justification in the first sense (using the word sanctification to talk about this third sense of justification). So, when we read it in the writings of medieval theologians we read that "we are 'justified' by works" and we cry "heresy". However, quite frequently, all that they are saying (this all depends on properly understanding the context) is that a human being is made into a just person (justification of his character) by doing just works. This is biblical teaching.)

Paul is constantly telling us to imitate him as he imitates Christ (1 Cor. 11:1). Philippians 4:8-10 is all about thinking rightly and acting rightly in order to have right thoughts and do right actions. Our character is formed, through the power of the Holy Spirit, by our actions (2 Pet. 1:3-10). The whole point of the book of James, especially chapter 2, is that our justification, being made into just people, is not just a question of a "workless" faith. Rather, in order to be made into a just person we need to do just works. Being made “just before God” (which is the first sense) happens by faith alone. Becoming a person who is just, in character, is a result of just actions accomplished through the power of the Holy Spirit (2 Pet. 1:3-11).

Anyways, just some food for thought.

Popular posts from this blog

How Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism resulted in Agnosticism

Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to take a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions. I would submit that Kant’s synthesis of these two views leads to an agnosticism about what Kant called “the thing-in-itself”, and ultimately to the philosophical positions known as Atheism, determinism, and nihilism.


Kant’s Sources
First of all, Kant was influenced by Hume’s empiricism and Newton’s physics. He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and only led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon…

LEISURE: THE BASIS OF CULTURE – A BOOK REVIEW

Leisure: The Basis of Culture & the Philosophical Act. Josef Pieper. Translated by Alexander Dru. 1963. Reprint, Ignatius Press, 2009. 143 pp. $12.99. ISBN 978-1-58617-256-5.
            This book is composed of two articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of each of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this book, Leisure: the Basis of Culture and The Philosophical Act, were both published in 1947, and, as such, were written during the cultural crisis in Germany that followed the Second World War. Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time – Martin Heidegger. As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg…

IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE by Martin Heidegger

I don’t propose to attempt any sort of reply to Martin Heidegger in this article. The purpose of this article is to explain Martin Heidegger’s thoughts, as they are found in the book, Identity and Difference. Martin Heidegger is a difficult thinker to understand, and requires a lot of work to fully appreciate his arguments. My primary goal in this article is to introduce the reader to two very important articles written by Heidegger, and, I hope, to properly explain Heidegger’s views on Being and beings.
            This book is composed of two articles written by Martin Heidegger and translated with an introduction by Joan Stambaugh. The first article, The Principle of Identity, is “the unchanged text of a lecture given on the occasion of the 500th anniversary of the University of Freiburg im Breisgau, for the faculty day on June 27, 1957.”[1] The second article The Onto-theo-logical Constitution of Metaphysics, is “the explication that concluded a seminar during the wint…