Skip to main content

Interesting Thoughts from an Interview with C. S. Lewis

    The article "Cross-Examination", in the book Essay Collection and other Short Pieces, is the publication and compilation of various interviews with C. S. Lewis. In these interviews Lewis makes some interesting comments which I though worthy of sharing.

    Concerning salvation, C. S. Lewis said, "It is not enough to want to get rid of one's sins. We also need to believe in the One who saves us from our sins. Not only do we need to recognize that we are sinners; we need to believe in a Saviour who takes away sin. Matthew Arnold once wrote, 'Nor does the being hungry prove that we have bread'. Because we know we are sinners, it does not follow that we are saved. (p. 553)"
 
    Salvation from sins is based upon our belief that Jesus is able to save us from our sins. It is one thing to know that the Bible says that Jesus is God and that by believing "that he is God and that he is raised from the dead" we will be saved from our sins; it is a step further (perhaps it would be better to say, it is a totally different thing) to belief what the Bible says, and to belief that it is for you. There is a distinction to be made between knowledge that an authority says X, and believing that the authority is saying the truth about X. It is the latter that saves, not the former.

    Concerning how to write well, Lewis says, "The way for a person to develop a style is (a) to know exactly what he wants to say, and (b) to be sure he is saying exactly that. The reader , we must remember, does not start by knowing what we mean. If our words are ambiguous, our meaning will escape him. (p. 555)"

    Concerning the relation between the Christian and everybody else, Lewis said, "Jesus Christ did not say, 'go into all the world and tell the world that it is quite right.' The Gospel is something completely different. In fact, it is directly opposed to the world. (p. 556)" Lewis is not saying, in this quote that non-Christian authors cannot speak the truth, or cannot be right about things. This is quite obvious because he says at an earlier point in the same article, "I do believe that God is the Father of lights - natural lights as well as spiritual lights (James 1:17). That is, God is not interested only in Christian writers as such. He is concerned with all kinds of writing. (p. 555)" This is in accord with the belief of the early church that all truth, regardless of where it is found, is God's truth, and as such can be procured, applauded as truth, and used to glorify God.

    Lewis also makes this interesting statement, in response to a question about what the future holds. "The great thing is to be found at one's post as a child of God, living each day as though it were our last, but planning as though our world might last a hundred years. (p. 557)" Taking advantage of each present moment, as Christ may return any time, but planning for your future, the future of your children, and the future generations that may come afterwards. Nobody knows when Christ will return, his return cannot be predicted. It is pointless to try to predict the end of the world. What is necessary is to live each moment as if it was your last, but to live wisely, planning for the future generations.

Popular posts from this blog

How Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism resulted in Agnosticism

Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to take a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions. I would submit that Kant’s synthesis of these two views leads to an agnosticism about what Kant called “the thing-in-itself”, and ultimately to the philosophical positions known as Atheism, determinism, and nihilism.


Kant’s Sources
First of all, Kant was influenced by Hume’s empiricism and Newton’s physics. He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and only led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon…

A Short outline of Charles Taylor's: The Malaise of Modernity

CHARLES TAYLOR’S THE MALAISE OF MODERNITY[1]
            This is simply an outline of Taylor’s basic argument in this short work written by Charles Taylor. The idea of this outline is to help the reader understand the book by providing a simple outline of the basic argument that Taylor is presenting here. The book, which is essentially the manuscript is the fruit of a series of presentations that Taylor made at the Massey Conferences which are hosted by Massey College and Radio-Canada, is divided into 10 chapters. In the first chapter Taylor essentially proposes three causes (recognizing that there may be more) of the Malaise of Modernity: (1) Individualism or the Loss of Sense, (2) The Primacy of Instrumental Reason or the Loss of Ends, and (3) The effect on society and politics in general of the loss of sense to an inauthentic individualism and the domination of instrumental reason, or, the loss of true freedom. Taylor considers the first Malaise in chapters 2 to 8, the second in c…

LEISURE: THE BASIS OF CULTURE – A BOOK REVIEW

Leisure: The Basis of Culture & the Philosophical Act. Josef Pieper. Translated by Alexander Dru. 1963. Reprint, Ignatius Press, 2009. 143 pp. $12.99. ISBN 978-1-58617-256-5.
            This book is composed of two articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of each of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this book, Leisure: the Basis of Culture and The Philosophical Act, were both published in 1947, and, as such, were written during the cultural crisis in Germany that followed the Second World War. Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time – Martin Heidegger. As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg…