Skip to main content

What it means to be a Human Person – Part 5 - Mans Place in the Spectrum of Living Things

The Aristotelian/ Thomistic conception of the universe, based upon observational (sensational) experience, divides all material things up into four forms: (1) Inanimate things, (2) Vegetative life, (3) Sensible Life, and (4) Intellectual, or Rational, life.[1]

Under the first grouping, inanimate things, we find things like rocks, planets, stars, mud, etc. The things grouped under this first level, show no signs of life, not even the most basic characteristics.

The last three divisions describe living things. Those living things which fall under the higher divisions also possess the qualities of the lower divisions, though in a different way. However, those living things in the lower divisions do not appear to possess the qualities of the higher divisions.

The first, and lowest, division of living things is known as vegetative life. Vegetative life, as the lowest division of living things, is common to all living things. It describes the basic functions of life, things that are done entirely unconsciously, namely, growth, nutrition, reproduction, and death.[2] All living things demonstrate these qualities, but some, such as plants and viruses, do not demonstrate more than these characteristics.

The second division of life is sensible life. Sensible life is that level that describes all those forms of life that, in one way or another, gain sensible knowledge of their surroundings. Such knowledge may be gained through touch, sound, sight, taste, smell, any combination of these senses, all of these senses together, or any combination of these senses along with other senses that we have not mentioned. Some animals have special senses that give them knowledge of their surroundings, for example, the snake uses a form of heat detection to find its prey, and bats use some form of echolocation to find their prey, and to fly in the dark.

This second division includes any life form that is able to gain knowledge about its surroundings through some sense, and is able to react to the knowledge gained. This division of life demonstrates a certain level of consciousness and desires. All forms of animal life fit under this second division, possessing both vegetative and sensible life.

The third division, intellectual, or rational, life, as applied to material beings, seems to be predicable only of humans. This third division describes mans capacity for rationality. Human people clearly possess all three divisions of life, and, as such, would be considered the highest division of material life. It is due to this rationality that humans have the ability to construct and communicate with symbols that possess meaning - that is, language. It seems that rationality is necessary for a being to be able to give a sense, or meaning, to events, symbols, things, etc.

These divisions are discovered through experiential, or sensible, observation, which is the humans first source of knowledge. These divisions are discovered through the observations of natural philosophy, which is, today, known by the general term - the natural sciences. As such, it is important to note, that Naturalism, and even Materialism,  is able to agree with everything that we have just said about the natural world. Certain philosophers, or scientists, may wish to explain the different divisions differently, and they may wish to give varying explanations of what life is, what reason is, etc., but they would agree with the general observations that we have just made.

In the Aristotelian tradition we refer to these forms of life as "souls". That is, the vegetative soul, the animal soul, and the rational soul. The term "soul" is an unfortunate term because it carries with it, in today's common usage, a certain definition that was not part of the Aristotelian definitions. In Greek, the term "psuche", which is translated into English by the term "soul", literally means, "breathe of life", or, quite simply, "life". (see: Perschbacher, Wesley J., The New Analytical Greek Lexicon (1990; repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1995), 444.) So defined most people would quite willingly agree that plants and animals have "souls", because they are "living". However, quite frequently, when people speak of "souls", they understand this word in the Cartesian sense, that is, "Descartes argued that only persons had souls ... As the subject of though, memory, emotion, desire, and action, the soul has been supposed to be an entity that makes self-consciousness possible..." (William E. Mann, "Soul," in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed., ed. Robert Audi (1999; repr., New York: Camridge University Press, 2009), 866.) As this is primarily a question of definition, we will maintain the Aristotelian tradition, and continue to use the term soul to refer to life. We will then be able to distinguish the different souls, that is to say, the different life forms - the vegetative soul, the animal, or sensible, soul, and the rational soul. (Descartes definition of a soul is roughly the equivalent of the rational soul.) 

We should also note, though we will look into it in more detail in a later post, that the term soul, is roughly the equivalent of the term "form" when applied to living things. That is to say, the soul is the form of the living being.



[1]George P. Klubertanz, The Philosophy of Human Nature (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953), 24. Cf. Aristotle, On the Soul.

[2]There may be some further intricacies, but we are not concerned, at this point, with an in-depth description of all of the elements of each level.

Popular posts from this blog

How Kant’s Synthesis of Empiricism and Rationalism resulted in Agnosticism

Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to take a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions. I would submit that Kant’s synthesis of these two views leads to an agnosticism about what Kant called “the thing-in-itself”, and ultimately to the philosophical positions known as Atheism, determinism, and nihilism.


Kant’s Sources
First of all, Kant was influenced by Hume’s empiricism and Newton’s physics. He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and only led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon…

A Short outline of Charles Taylor's: The Malaise of Modernity

CHARLES TAYLOR’S THE MALAISE OF MODERNITY[1]
            This is simply an outline of Taylor’s basic argument in this short work written by Charles Taylor. The idea of this outline is to help the reader understand the book by providing a simple outline of the basic argument that Taylor is presenting here. The book, which is essentially the manuscript is the fruit of a series of presentations that Taylor made at the Massey Conferences which are hosted by Massey College and Radio-Canada, is divided into 10 chapters. In the first chapter Taylor essentially proposes three causes (recognizing that there may be more) of the Malaise of Modernity: (1) Individualism or the Loss of Sense, (2) The Primacy of Instrumental Reason or the Loss of Ends, and (3) The effect on society and politics in general of the loss of sense to an inauthentic individualism and the domination of instrumental reason, or, the loss of true freedom. Taylor considers the first Malaise in chapters 2 to 8, the second in c…

LEISURE: THE BASIS OF CULTURE – A BOOK REVIEW

Leisure: The Basis of Culture & the Philosophical Act. Josef Pieper. Translated by Alexander Dru. 1963. Reprint, Ignatius Press, 2009. 143 pp. $12.99. ISBN 978-1-58617-256-5.
            This book is composed of two articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of each of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this book, Leisure: the Basis of Culture and The Philosophical Act, were both published in 1947, and, as such, were written during the cultural crisis in Germany that followed the Second World War. Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time – Martin Heidegger. As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg…